On Thursday 13 March 2008, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Dan Pascu writes: > > I'm sure there is more than one way to do this. The NACK sounds the > > simplest and least disruptive of all the ideas mentioned so far. > > anything that requires changes in SIP UAs is a very long term solution.
That is very obvious. Not only it can take a long time to get a consensus on a solution, it would take even longer to get it implemented in UAs. > in practice, we only have power to affect on how openser proxy is > behaving. Do you have any suggestion how can this be at least addressed, if not solved, using the current RFC framework? -- Dan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
