Hello Henning,

I remember that I had some issue with sipp long time ago because
openser is generating the branch param with the character '.' inside.
Sipp seems to have issues handling the character '.'.
In your scenario, check if the second Via header of the initial INVITE
has something after the character '.'.  In your 180 reply, there's
nothing after it:
SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-3206-1-0.<missing_something_here>


Regards,
Ovidiu Sas

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Henning Westerholt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  i use sipp as part of the test suite for the server. After a recent system 
> upgrade
>  (which upgraded also the sipp) i noticed that many tests stopped working.
>
>  The sipp (2.0.1-TLS-PCAP, version 20070516, built May 18 2007, 11:25:38.)
>  uses now the 'sent-by' parameter for building VIAs. This seems to break the
>  transaction matching (test 20.sh for example don't work anymore).
>
>  An example message (ngrep -W byline) looks like this:
>
>  U 127.0.0.1:5060 -> 127.0.0.1:5059
>  SIP/2.0 180 Ringing.
>  Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5059;branch=z9hG4bK4783.c7afa14., SIP/2.0/UDP 
> 127.0.0.1:5061;branch=z9hG4bK-3206-1-0.
>  From: sipp <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5061>;tag=3206SIPpTag001.
>  To: sut <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5059>;tag=3200SIPpTag011.
>  Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  CSeq: 1 INVITE.
>  Contact: <sip:localhost:5060;transport=UDP>.
>  Content-Length: 0.
>
>
>  Is this behaviour normal, e.g. are the messages of sipp invalid? Or is there
>  an error in the transaction matching logic of the server?
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Henning
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Devel mailing list
>  Devel@lists.openser.org
>  http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to