Hi Juha,

I tend to agree with Henning here - after all everything reduces to how 
you configure your logging levels. For example, you could use L_WARNING 
for your script. After all we cannot make distinction between what is 
logged from code and what from script, but there is a need for booth.

Maybe for solving this we could downgrade the log from C code to 
NOTICE......just an idea...

Regards,
Bogdan

Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Henning Westerholt writes:
>
>  > this was introduced only recently from Anca (rev 4067), and also
>  > extended from 
>  > Dan i think. In my opinion LM_INFO is correct, as this is a informational 
>  > message. I emmit for example in the carrierroute module similar messages 
> for 
>  > the successful routing. What is the purpose of the LM_INFO level in your 
>  > opinion? 
>
> in my opnion because there is no limit for informational message that
> openser could generate, it should not generate them at all except at
> debug level.  i would like to leave info level to messages from openser
> script.  now if openser generates info level also own, it is impossible
> for me to run openser at a debug level where i will only see messages
> generated from the script.
>
> -- juha
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@lists.openser.org
> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>   


_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to