Hi Juha, I tend to agree with Henning here - after all everything reduces to how you configure your logging levels. For example, you could use L_WARNING for your script. After all we cannot make distinction between what is logged from code and what from script, but there is a need for booth.
Maybe for solving this we could downgrade the log from C code to NOTICE......just an idea... Regards, Bogdan Juha Heinanen wrote: > Henning Westerholt writes: > > > this was introduced only recently from Anca (rev 4067), and also > > extended from > > Dan i think. In my opinion LM_INFO is correct, as this is a informational > > message. I emmit for example in the carrierroute module similar messages > for > > the successful routing. What is the purpose of the LM_INFO level in your > > opinion? > > in my opnion because there is no limit for informational message that > openser could generate, it should not generate them at all except at > debug level. i would like to leave info level to messages from openser > script. now if openser generates info level also own, it is impossible > for me to run openser at a debug level where i will only see messages > generated from the script. > > -- juha > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.openser.org > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel