Hello Henning, On 06/09/08 19:36, Henning Westerholt wrote: > On Monday 09 June 2008, Dan Pascu wrote: > >>> OK, send_route might be too late for discussion and implementation >>> without breaking too much the current scheduling. We can focus on the >>> local_route and review the modules that can be activated and see what >>> else can be done there to have good coherence in 1.4. >>> >> In this context, I have nothing against a week delay to have the >> local_route properly finished and better integrated. >> > > Hello, > > (looking at the responses so far..) > > ok, then starts with the necessary work for a better integration > of "local_route". Other new features besides this should be not implemented, > for this the trunk is already frozen. A few days should be sufficient for > this task, or i'm wrong? > For me is ok couple of days to review the modules and enable the local_route for those that worth and see what else can be added there.
Thanks, Daniel > Henning > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.openser.org > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel > > -- http://www.asipto.com _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
