Hi Henning, to be honest, I do not like what happens:
1) major design issues and architectural reasons are invoked just to mislead people around and delay the freeze - and now the only changes are about enabling the local_route for more certain modules...hmmm...This looks like pushing arguments for one thing and actually doing something else at the end. 2) waste of time - these changes could have been done last Friday if somebody would have said it clear - it is a task that takes maximum one hour. 3) the whole discussion about the initial commit was about principals and how each opinion matters for the project - now, based on three people opinion, the SVN is partially un-frozen without no prior notification about this decision. Are only three developers in this project? 4) changes started to be done, but without no prior consultation on the matter - if I'm not wrong this was the main invoked reason for this whole discussion..... again , I do not like this because some serious disrespect for the people working here in this project. Regards, bogdan Henning Westerholt wrote: > On Tuesday 10 June 2008, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > >> Is the SVN frozen or not? The announced date was for 6th of June and >> there is an ongoing discussion about pre-longing this date or not, but >> there was no decision yet announced. >> >> And I see non bug fixing commits going through..... >> > > Hi Bogdan, > > Dan, Juha and myself agreed that it is ok if Daniel integrate local_route in > the next few days. Thus for this work the code freeze is not in place, for > all other work it is. At the end of the week this work will be finished, and > then only documentation, bug-fixes and helper tools commits will be done, as > its policy. > > Henning > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
