Hello Henning. Thank you very much for your kund answer. Now for me it is clearer the process.
I will try to keep contributing to OpenSER as much as I can. Best regards. Sergio Gutiérrez. On 6/18/08, Henning Westerholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 17 June 2008, Sergio Gutierrez wrote: > > First than all, I would like to apologize for my ignorance about this > > matter. > > > > I would like to know what would be the right procedure when submitting > > patches which implement improvements to existing features, or that > > increase the portability of OpenSER. > > > > I ask this, because I have submitted a patch which still has not > > reviewed, so I am not sure whether I am not submitting the patch > > according to the right procedure. > > Hi Sergio, > > i assume that you refer to this patch: > #1912012, Add LOCALBASE for LDAP libraries and includes on Solaris ? > > The merging of new patches depends on the actual workload, the state of the > development, the (individual) priorities and some other factors.. As we're an > open source project, there is no central scheduling mechanism in place, so > sometimes things just are not picked up. ;-) > > I'll take a look to this patch. > > Henning > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
