On Tuesday 24 June 2008, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > >> Then I believe that not running openser will solve all bugs, nothing > >> will go wrong. This discussion goes aside the topic. If you consider > >> that doing operations to a message and affecting a completely > >> different message is not broken and critical because one has the > >> choice not to use those functions, then I cannot comment more on > >> this. > > Either you don't understand what I am saying with above and below > phrases, or I don't understand what you are still asking.
What I would like to see is a small sample of a script that does something and the result is broken with the local_route inplace. The example you gave with the m_dump inconsistency, is easily fixable IMO. Did you find any other case that shows that the local_route breaks something and it can't be fixed without a redesign? > > As said, let's move on and chose a direction. If for you solves the > accounting of self generated messages, for me breaks the > pseudo-variable engine, accounting, logging and routing. But we are not > alone here. I am going to fix what is broken in my side of code in any > of the variants. I'm perfectly happy with this approach. If everybody checks/fixes their code, then before the release we can draw a line and if there are still complaints of broken stuff we can ifdef and disable it. That's what I asked from the beginning. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
