On Saturday 12 July 2008, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Dan Pascu writes: > > I'm really intrigued by this stance. If something has/had bugs, it > > means it is a bad idea? > > dan, > > my post was not intended to offense anyone.
No offense taken. I was just wondering how did you associate the fact that something has bugs/issues with the fact that it's a bad idea. For me it only means that the implementation is not yet stable/mature enough. Concept and implementation are 2 different things. I cannot say the concept is bad only because the implementation has bugs, as I can't say the concept is good only because the implementation is impeccable. In the end keeping dialog state is what every user agent does. Does that mean by extension that a user agent is a bad idea? > i just noticed a fact and > was wondering why dialog module has had more problems than other > modules. It's a much more complex piece of software than other modules, with a much more complex interaction with the environment. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
