Anca Vamanu writes: > I have now looked through the RFC and to be honest, I think that I > shouldn't have done the change and still let the Subscribe go to the > presence server. I don't remember which was the reason to change it at > that moment, but I remember it came after a discussion with Dan Pascu > when he gave me a strong argument to do so. I am willing to change it > back, but will first wait for Dan's input on this.
anca, i noticed this problem with real commercial sip ua that sends subscribe with eventlist in supported header even when subscribe is not for a list. in fact, i don't see any chance how ua would know beforehand if target of subscription is a list or not. in supported header it just tells that it can handle eventlist. -- juha _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
