We support the current and latest version, the version that is going to become an RFC (is now in the RFC editor queue).
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-19.txt Depending on which previous version of ICE the device implement they may work or not only real testing can show. Adrian On Mar 9, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Thomas Gelf wrote: > Additional note: I did not yet start my tests, but I already made some > captures and gave a look at the SDP body generated by those snom > phones > allowed to use ICE. > > It seems that they are still doing ICE as proposed in > draft-rosenberg-sipping-ice - and not as in the RFC-to-be mmusic > draft. > > The new OpenSIPS/Mediaproxy enhancement does not have support for this > "legacy" ICE variant, does it? > > Regards, > Thomas > > Thomas Gelf wrote: >> As I consider ICE one of the most exciting and underestimated >> features >> in the SIP world, I decided to dedicate ICE a whole test day within >> this >> week. I'll set up a dedicated OpenSIPS proxy, a single MediaProxy >> relay >> and make intensive tests using a few snom phones (370, 820, 870 - >> they >> all shall support ICE) behind different NAT types (symmetric and >> others). >> >> I'll let you know the result as soon as I have done so. In the >> meantime >> a big hug for all your effort and for your great software! >> >> Cheers, >> Thomas >> >> Adrian Georgescu wrote: >>> If someone else has ICE enabled end-points, can test and provide us >>> with feedback about the success rate of the ICE negotiation would be >>> great to fine tune the software! >> > > > -- > mail: tho...@gelf.net > web: http://thomas.gelf.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel