@lemenkov , I agree, the modules should be named after the protocol it
implements. BUT, as far as I understood from @rfuchs's posts this new module
has nothing to do with the classical known RTPproxy protocol (used by RTPProxy
application). The new protocol is binary, json oriented, etc..
Maybe I got it wrong and if so, please correct it.
But if the protocol used in this new module has nothing to do (aside origins)
with the protocal used by RTPproxy relay, not even being backward compatible,
IMHO, it should not carry the name of rtpproxy-xx at all. It will be confusion
and damage to the users (see the arguments in @saghul's initial post ).
Please let's keep this discussion strictly technical and strictly about
OpenSIPS.
Thank you all, Bogdan
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/152#issuecomment-35802868
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
