Hi Bogdan, Thank you for your reply. Unlike kamailio, Opensips has timer value in seconds which is enough for the reply back. Just recalled the tm timer values for opensips. I didn't test it with Opensips but i think you are right.
Since origin of both projects is same and the sample config was identical, I thought it should applicable to opensips as well. As soon as i will have time i will give a try to msilo with opensips. Thank your for correction. -- regards, abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 | o: +92 30 0841 1445 On 13 April 2018 at 18:19, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org> wrote: > Hi Abdul, > > Not sure if this is applicable for us. According to the script sample, the > fr_timer (in seconds) is 10....Is this value too low for a server to > properly reply back ?? > > I guess that bug is Kamailio specific. We are on the safe side ;) > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > http://www.opensips-solutions.com > OpenSIPS Summit 2018 > http://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2018Amsterdam > > On 04/13/2018 12:42 AM, Abdul Basit wrote: > > Hi Opensips team, > > I faced instant message timeout issues with MSILO module while setting SIP > IM server using kamailio. > It turned out that fr_timer values was too low to wait for MESSAGE > delivery to the destination (online/offline both cases) that server was > replying with 408. > Which result in message sending failed on sending side where as IM was > reaching to the destination. > > The same issue is true for msilo sample configuration > <http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.3.x/msilo.html#idp5682352> > for opensips. > Kindly update it at your end as well. This will save lot of time for the > ones who want to use opensips as IM server. > > -- > regards, > > abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 | o: +92 30 0841 1445 > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Abdul Basit <basit.e...@gmail.com> > Date: 13 April 2018 at 02:28 > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] MSILO: SIP stored offline MESSAGE repetitive > delivery > To: Henning Westerholt <h...@kamailio.org> > > > Thanks Henning. > > Good move. You removed the timers so that they use their default values :) > > Same need to be done in sample msilo script > https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/modules/msilo.html#idp45433660 > > Who will be doing that? > > > -- > regards, > > abdul basit | p: +92 32 1416 4196 | o: +92 30 0841 1445 > > On 13 April 2018 at 00:37, Henning Westerholt <h...@kamailio.org> wrote: > >> On Thursday, 12 April 2018 10:15:19 CEST Abdul Basit wrote: >> > My issue for IM handling has been resolved. >> > >> > @MS helped to look into the matter. From to the example >> > [..] >> > >> > I replaced it as below >> > >> > # -- tm params -- >> > >> > modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 10000 ) >> > modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 15 ) >> > modparam("tm", "wt_timer", 10 ) >> > >> > >> > Lower fr_timer was initiating 408 without waiting for 200 OK from >> > destination because 10ms is too low. This was confusing msilo module and >> > the sender device that MESSAGE sent was failed. >> > Increasing the fr_timer value resolved the issue. >> > This also resolved a ripple effect. i.e, kamailio delivery of offline >> > messages from DB store to the destination party. >> > Since kamailio was get message delivery error, it was >> > executing failure_route[1] that was storing the message again in DB >> store >> > as offline message and so on. >> > >> > lower fr_timer values are also exits in 3.x, 4.x, 5x and dev branches >> > documentation. >> > [..] >> >> Hello Abdul, >> >> great that you found the issue. I have fixed this issue in git master and >> also >> 5.1 and 5.0 branch. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Henning >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing > listUsers@lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
