Hi Dan,
OK, so the Presence Server is on a different instance than the RLS
server and the routing between is DNS based - thanks for clarifying
this for me. Again, as a fist step, I'm trying to understand the
scenario you have (including how RLS works) so I can understand what is
going on inside of OpenSIPS.
So we have the 30 SUBSCRIBE requests being sent out from one TCP worker
process. And due the DNS failure, this takes 7.5 minutes. And you claim
that during these 7.5 minutes OpenSIPS was not able to handle any other
traffic ? If so, same questions:
- the remaining traffic was coming via the same TCP conn as the
original received SUBSCRIBE ?
- if NO on above, the remaining traffic was also RLS related ?
- if NO on above, the remaining traffic also TCP/TLS or was also UDP ?
Just as a fact, there is no kind of dependency/sync between the TCP
workers, in a way to block all the other procs while one of them is busy.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit, Amsterdam, May 2020
https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2020Amsterdam/
OpenSIPS Bootcamp, Miami, March 2020
https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_Bootcamp_2020/
On 1/15/20 1:13 PM, Dan Pascu wrote:
On 15 Jan 2020, at 12:07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Dan,
I'm not so familiar with how the RLS works, so bear with me while trying to
understand the scenario.
In your case, the initial subscribe (to RLS), from the end point, will be
received by opensips via one of the TCP workers (the alg for distributing the
new TCP conns to a TCP worker is rather simple, filling in the workers from
first to last, so yes, the first conn will land all the time into the first
worker).
Now, while handling this initial SUBSCRIBE (in RLS module), the module will
fire the 30 new SUBSCRIBE requests (to the real entities) - these SUBSCRIBEs (I
assume) will go via loopback to OpenSIPS again, as presence server - it this
correct?
No. All (except maybe one) will go to a different server (this is a test server
and all contacts are in different domains). But even for the one that is local
it still does the DNS lookup because I have dns = yes in settings that forces
DNS lookups even for local domains.
if so, is there any DNS lookup involved while these SUBSCRIBEs are looping (I
would say no, as RLS uses the `presence_server` param (but it can be FQDN I
guess :-/ ) ?
Yes. See above. There is a DNS lookup (3 actually NAPTR/SRV/A) involved for
every destination. That's why it's blocked for 7.5 minutes out of every 10
minutes.
Aslo, this looping is done via TCP (between opensips RLS and opensips Presence
Server) ?
Yes. TLS actually.
In case I didn't convey my message well, I want to reiterate that I do not see
this as an RLS issue (except maybe that RLS could be optimized to use different
workers for the different SUBSCRIBEs it sends out, instead of sending all of
them from just one worker). The problem I see is that while this 1st worker is
occupied for 7.5 minutes out of 10 with RLS, no incoming request is processed,
as if it is allocated to the same worker that is already busy with RLS. RLS in
this case is just a useful trigger that highlights the problem because it keeps
1 worker busy 75% of the time.
My question is about why are no other incoming requests processed during the
7.5 minutes while RLS keeps the 1st TCP worker busy (because of DNS failures),
but I see incoming requests processed when I'm in the 2.5 minute window when
RLS is idle and not using TCP worker 1. For me it looks like some allocation
problem with TCP workers as there are 4 idle workers, yet the incoming messages
are not allocated to any of them.
Best regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
https://www.opensips-solutions.com
OpenSIPS Summit, Amsterdam, May 2020
https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2020Amsterdam/
OpenSIPS Bootcamp, Miami, March 2020
https://opensips.org/training/OpenSIPS_Bootcamp_2020/
On 1/10/20 1:59 PM, Dan Pascu wrote:
I noticed some unexpected behavior related to how TCP workers are allocated to
process requests. This was highlighted during dome DNS outage due to how
opensips was configured.
Here are the relevant bits from my configuration to layout the context:
I listen on UDP, TCP and TLS and I start 5 UDP and 5 TCP worker processes, but
allow them to grow up to 25 based on load:
listen = udp:IP:5060
listen = tcp:IP:5060
listen = tls:IP:5061
auto_scaling_profile = SIP_WORKERS
scale up to 25 on 80% for 4 cycles within 5
scale down to 5 on 20% for 10 cycles
tcp_workers = 5 use_auto_scaling_profile SIP_WORKERS
udp_workers = 5 use_auto_scaling_profile SIP_WORKERS
DNS is configured to use only 1 server and only 1 attempt with a timeout of 5
seconds per request:
dns = yes
rev_dns = no
dns_use_search_list = no
disable_dns_blacklist = yes
dns_retr_time = 5
dns_retr_no = 1
dns_servers_no = 1
This means that every time a domain is looked up but the DNS server is down, it
will do 3 requests (NAPTR, SRV and A) and each will take 5 seconds to timeout.
In other words a DNS lookup for a domain will timeout after 15 seconds.
I have 1 device that connects over TLS and registers an account that uses RLS
and has 30 contacts stored.
Now the event was that the main DNS server was down, and because of my
configuration I didn't fallback to the secondary one from resolv.conf so all
DNS requests failed.
During this time I noticed that whenever RLS kicked in it would attempt to send
SUBSCRIBEs to the 30 contacts and fail for each of them, and the whole thing
would take approximately 7.5 minutes, during which time it would always use the
1st TCP worker which would increase it's load and 1 minute load to 100% and the
10 minutes load would stay at 77%. This was in line with the fact that RLS was
triggered every 10 minutes and spend 7.5 minutes stuck in DNS timeouts, so it
was busy approximately 75% of the time.
The fact that RLS always used TCP worker 1 is not unexpected as the SIP device
I mentioned was the only one connected to the proxy and the only one sending
requests, so the proxy was mostly idle doing RLS every 10 minutes, besides the
occasional REGISTER/SUBSCRIBE from the device.
The unexpected behavior is that during the 7.5 minutes when RLS tried to send
SUBSCRIBEs to the contacts, any REGISTER or INVITE received by the proxy would
not be processed. They seem to be scheduled on the same 1st TCP worker that is
already loaded 100% from the RLS processing that is going on. I never see any
log message from my script about processing the REGISTER or INVITE and they
just timeout on the client. If I send the REGISTER or INVITE during the 2.5
minutes when RLS is not trying to send SUBSCRIBEs to the contacts, then I see
the REGISTER and INVITE being processed and logging from the script, but the
INVITE also fails due to DNS failure.
If I change my outbound proxy to prefer UDP, then I see the REGISTER and INVITE
being processed, but if I use TCP or TLS I do not see them being processed
unless I'm in the 2.5 minute window when the proxy is not doing RLS (actually I
never checked but it's possible that the requests that arrived in the 7.5
minute window were actually processed and logged when the RLS processing window
ended, but I never waited that long and they always timeout out on the client
in 30 seconds).
Now I can understand that RLS does all in a single worker (it does a database
lookup for the contacts and then loops all of them trying to send a SUBSCRIBE
for each), even though it could be argued that it could be optimized to
delegate each sending out to a different worker.
What puzzles me is why is opensips allocating the incoming requests it receives
to a TCP worker that is already busy and shows a 100% load in opensips-cli,
while it has 4 other TCP workers that are completely idle. Or if my conclusion
is wrong, what exactly happens that during the 7.5 minutes where RLS uses TCP
worker 1 trying to send out the SUBSCRIBEs and failing, that no incoming
request is processed by the other 4 idle TCP workers and it just times out?
That is not to say that I do not see the other TCP worker's pid in syslog at
all, but they only appear very rarely and the idle workers do not seem to ever
be used during the 7.5 minute busy window when the 1st worker is 100% loaded.
So some worker allocation seems to happen when processing multiple incoming
requests that arrive in parallel, but while RLS is sending out the SUBSCRIBEs
it never seems to try to use the idle workers for incoming requests.
--
Dan
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Dan
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
