Hello po4a developers, while updating the po4a translation I noticed the following potential improvements:
po4a:122
========
Current:
"The provided directory must contain a set of PO files, each named F<XX.po> "
"with C<XX> the ISO 639-1 of the language used in this file. The directory "
Suggested improvement:
"The provided directory must contain a set of PO files, each named F<XX.po> "
"with C<XX> the ISO 639-1 code of the language used in this file (two or more
letters). The directory "
Rationale:
e.g. pt_BR, or sr_Cyrl, or zh_CHS, or zh_Hant
doc/po4a.7.pod:79
=================
Current:
"Then, the I<manual editing> reported depicts the action of the translators, "
"that modify the PO files to provide translations to every original string "
"and paragraph. "
Suggested improvement:
"Then, the I<manual editing> block depicts the action of the translators, "
"that modify the PO files to provide translations to every original string "
"and paragraph. "
Rationale:
The paragraph is referring to the graphics which contains various
blocks with actions. Also in "manual editing" nothing is reported.
doc/po4a.7.pod:109
==================
Current:
"You can also set the insertion I<mode> to the value C<before>, with a "
"similar semantic: combining C<mode=before> with an C<endboundary> will put "
"the addendum just B<after> the matched boundary, that the last potential "
"boundary line before the C<position>. Combining C<mode=before> with an "
"C<beginboundary> will put the addendum just B<before> the matched boundary, "
"that the last potential boundary line before the C<position>."
Suggested improvement:
"You can also set the insertion I<mode> to the value C<before>, with a "
"similar semantic: combining C<mode=before> with an C<endboundary> will put "
"the addendum just B<after> the matched boundary, that is the last potential "
~~
"boundary line before the C<position>. Combining C<mode=before> with an "
"C<beginboundary> will put the addendum just B<before> the matched boundary, "
"that is the last potential boundary line before the C<position>."
~~
Rationale:
Missing verb in the clause after the comma started with "that".
Alternatively (if the meaning remains the same?) In both cases the
word "that" could be deleted.
Greetings
Helge
--
Dr. Helge Kreutzmann [email protected]
Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
