Security by obscurity, what could possibly go wrong?! On Oct 20, 2011 11:50 AM, "Gregor Mahnic" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Indeed there is nothing wrong with opera. In fact because few people use > it there are also less exploits out there for it which makes it safer to > use. > > --- On *Thu, 10/20/11, Wolfden <[email protected]>* wrote: > > > From: Wolfden <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [sabayon-dev] Suggestion for Spins - New Default Browser > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, October 20, 2011, 9:16 AM > > > > 2011/10/20 Sławomir Nizio > <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> > > > > Also why there's no Opera listed is beyond me. Isn't it mainstream > enough? (At least it seems they haven't ban this browser yet.) > Anyways, > "The new Automatic option for Identify As now enables built-in > compatiblity quirks to work around mis-behaving websites like > Google's. You can still choose a genuine Midori identity which doesn't > do that." > - > http://www.twotoasts.de/index.php?/archives/47-Building,-private-browsing-and-identity-crisis.html > (0.4.1). > > > I said mainstream browser and just list a couple for example, it makes no > difference to me. From my website stats, Firefox, IE, and Chromium are top > 3 most used browsers among 4000+ unique visitors a month. There is nothing > wrong with Opera. > > -- > KJS > ~wolfden~ > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > > > >
