On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Mitch Harder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Fabio Erculiani <[email protected]> wrote: >> I suspect it's a genkernel initramfs regression. >> Could you try adding "scandelay=5" or other usb (and delay) boot params? >> > > Adding a scandelay boot parameter fixed the problem.
I have to retract the previous message. I forgot which ISO image I last had on the USB device (need more coffee!). It was the Daily from May 27th. When I retested with the S9 x86_64 XFCE iso image, scandelay=10 was still failing at the same point. I'll try some other boot parameters. Let me know if you have any ideas which ones might make the most sense.
