Still using it on several systems: three servers and a Minimac (I'm
using it for building a smart pervasive screen).
Don't forget that many systems still exist with decent performance and
no amd64 support, Pentium 4 for instance.

Moreover, I can see many users still download the x86 version (I'm
seeding the torrents). It's not dead at all.

I would wait a few years. In my opinion x86 is still worth the
resources we are dedicating to it.

2013/5/1 Vojtěch Pszczólka <[email protected]>:
> Despite of i'm not developing Sabayon, i can't see any reason for maintaining 
> i386. How looks typical i386 user :-D ?
>
> Wolfden <[email protected]>napsal/a:
>
>>I for killing it off too
>>
>>
>>On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Ian Whyman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> As always I am very much pro this.
>>> On 1 May 2013 07:30, "Fabio Erculiani" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, x86_64 is more than 10 years old now, and it's time to think again
>>>> about the i686 architecture.
>>>> I am proposing to gradually drop support for x86 32bit by the end of
>>>> 2013 (the "how" would deserve a separate discussion).
>>>> Is there any serious reason not to kill 32bit? Maintaining it takes
>>>> 50% of our resources (time and space) and we could just dedicate some
>>>> of them to the other emerging architecture called ARM.
>>>>
>>>> This is just an RFC for now, don't get scared.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> --
>>>> Fabio Erculiani
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>KJS
>>~wolfden~
>>
>>
>



--
Ing. Dott. Danilo Pianini

Site: http://www.danilopianini.org/
Phone: +39 320 41 36 573
Skype: dany.sk

Reply via email to