Cool!
I've already one or two comments, but it does not seem to be too bad.
I can review the pull request if you send one.

On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Sławomir Nizio
<slawomir.ni...@sabayon.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is 'equo unused' and it works, but I was thinking of making
> something that works more like emerge --depclean (if I understand
> correctly how it works). I have forked the git repository of Entropy and
> made such a change.
>
> It can be found here: https://github.com/Enlik/entropy/commits/master.
>
> "[entropy.client] equo unused that works more like emerge --depclean
> It's more like a draft. It works, it prints packages that might be
> uninstalled, but several options are ignored, etc."
>
> to test: git clone…; cd client; equo unused
>
> The change is simple, but treat it as experimental (no guarantees!). I
> don't know the Entropy code base well (heck, I barely do), and I didn't
> spend much time on looking how things work, but anyway - what's important:
>
> - the dependency calculation doesn't seem to be costly! I may have
> oversimplified something, though;
> - it seems to work quite well in terms on what is printed (except that
> maybe spm-installed packages should be treated as installed by user).
>
> It works this way: select all packages that are marked as being
> installed by user, collect their dependencies recursively, and print
> packages that are installed but not on that collection.
>
> I am curious on what you think.
>
> Fabio: maybe you would be interested in this as well.
>



-- 
Fabio Erculiani

Reply via email to