Not if hey are in the same slot as latest drivers. Only option we have is to downgrade. Personally I'd like to avoid that.
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Jerrod Frost <piroisl...@gmail.com> wrote: > For stability can we get nvidia-drivers-384.98 back in the repo. I'm > seeing instability (locking and getting kicked out of KDE, games crashing, > black or non-updating screen) > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:19 PM Jerrod Frost <piroisl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Samba bump, if any, could happen after release. No functional changes >> really unless we go 4.7, but even those changes are not something a normal >> user without a domain and controller would run into it seems. 4.7 does try >> to enforce SMB3 usage and discourages SMB1/CIFS for security reasons. >> >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017, 1:23 PM Joost Ruis <joost.r...@sabayon.org> wrote: >> >>> I recently bumped nvidia-drivers for Entropy against all kernels and >>> wasn't aware that 387.XX is actually a beta version. Just followed what was >>> done on our overlay: >>> >>> https://github.com/Sabayon/sabayon-distro/commit/ >>> f79f1cf16b1c4d1be390823271710ed73bdae83c >>> >>> @Francesco any thoughts? >>> >>> I must say that I didn't have any problems with them on my gaming >>> laptop. >>> We hopefully have a newer zfs version available in Entropy, one that >>> also supports the 4.14 kernel that is currently in Limbo. >>> >>> @Ettore should have a say about efivar 0.21 -> 31 && efibootmgr 0.12 -> >>> 15. I don't touch them. Same goes for sys-boot/grub. >>> >>> No opinion about Samba here. If we wanna bump this prior to "the >>> release" let me know and I will take care off it. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:06 PM, Sławomir Nizio < >>> slawomir.ni...@sabayon.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I can comment on this one for sure: >>>> >>>> > Samba (not really sure what to do here. CVE-2017-15275,14746,11103, >>>> list >>>> > goes on an on) we need to be on 4.5.14, but that doesn't cure all the >>>> > CVE on samba's page but switching to 4.7.2 is just switching to a list >>>> > of unknown vulnerabilities. Is it really beneficial to go from 4.5 to >>>> > 4.7? at the very least we should be 4.5.14, but beyond that I'm not >>>> sure >>>> > how we should proceed or the effort it would take to constantly hop as >>>> > samba updates at a pretty fast pace.. Looking for some insight on this >>>> > topic. >>>> >>>> I'm keeping it in the overlay to fix automatic dependency on Ceph. It >>>> was fixed in Gentoo in a new version that is not yet stable. >>>> >>>> I don't see benefit to switch to unstable (in Gentoo terms) one, unless >>>> there is a reason to do otherwise, risking the usage of a less tested >>>> (in theory) version. Also note that in case of a security issue, Gentoo >>>> would either backport a fix to the older series, or new upstream version >>>> (in the same "series" or newer) should be stabilized soon enough. >>>> >>>> (If there is a version that has a fix on some CVE and is not listed in >>>> Gentoo bug tracker, it's a good idea to file a bug there.) >>>> >>>> >>> >>> > > >
