Why not? I doubt you will notice any performance issues. No need to be over zealous about optimization, you're using qml for an application anyways, not coding an OS or background service.
Although I agree that there should be greater variety of stock validators, for simpler cases with strings. Andrey Kozhevnikov kirjoitti Sat Oct 04 2014 21:56:57 GMT+0300 (EEST): > You really need validators for text data? Adding complex RegExpValidator > just for handling empty state? Really? > > 05.10.2014 00:52, sailfishmail пишет: > > I think the validator property will help you; search for "qml using > > validators" or similar. Or > > http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/texthandling.html and the > > "acceptableInput" property of TextInput. > > > > Andrey Kozhevnikov kirjoitti Sat Oct 04 2014 21:40:48 GMT+0300 (EEST): > >> something like this: http://pastebin.com/Vv0PcrJA > >> > >> 05.10.2014 00:14, Cernunnos Wynand пишет: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have the following code for a dialog which will only be accepted if it > >>> has been completely filled out: http://pastebin.com/WUpHhxJh > >>> > >>> I find this a bit cumbersome. Does anyone have suggestions or > >>> improvements? > >>> > >>> Cernunnos > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > >>> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to > >>> devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org > >> > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.or -- _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
