I believe all that Qt says is already stated in the licensing acceptance forms of the sdk (GLP3/LGPL3); As I see it, LGPL3 is Cool with LGPLv2.1 (see FSF's tables); unless im missing something. Im no lawyer myself, tho, so my word counts only so much.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Adam Pigg <a...@piggz.co.uk> wrote: > I wonder if its possible to get some input to that from the qt > company/digia/kdab to prevent any possible confusion ? > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 at 20:14 Osmo Salomaa <otsal...@iki.fi> wrote: > >> On 08.01.2017 16:57, James Noori wrote: >> > So far there is only 1 topic announced and that usually means we are >> going to postpone the meeting, but I am going to send this reminder out >> instead and wait for more topics to get announced. >> >> I added "QtLocation and Qt 5.6 licensing in general". >> >> -- >> Osmo Salomaa <otsal...@iki.fi> >> _______________________________________________ >> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list >> To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscribe@lists. >> sailfishos.org > > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscribe@lists. > sailfishos.org >
_______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
