Pali Rohár wrote: > On Friday 13 December 2019 00:37:13 Bjoern Bidar wrote: >> Hey >> >> Looks really interessting especially when considering how buggy the >> profile handling is currently and the mess that every vendor creates. > > My proposed design already handles battery level (via AT+IPHONEACCEV > command and other vendors too) and should allow to define new interfaces > for other vendor extensions which may come in future. > >> I think when it comes to the programming language c plus glib is probably >> the preffered choice. > > For prototype implementation which basically handles whole specification > except HFP AG role I chose Perl language. But just because it is fast > for me to write such low level code which needs to parse lot of text > protocol commands and do socket bluetooth socket stuff. It was just > prototype to check if my prosed API specification make sense and if it > is possible to implement daemon according to it. C language is fine for > me, but I decision would depends on people who would do real > implementation. > > If somebody else is interesting in with helping, please let me know. > >> I hope this brings linux closer to the feature state of bluedroid.
Respect! I played recently a lot with BT so got interested in what you are writing. I found https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=236499 pointing to the spec 1.7 https://www.bluetooth.org/docman/handlers/DownloadDoc.ashx?doc_id=292287 Looks like that not all devices support one and the same method to report battery level. (I can imagine that not many support H[S|F]P). Anyway - seems to be interesting topic https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49078659/check-battery-level-of-connected-bluetooth-device-on-linux https://www.bluetooth.com/specifications/gatt/ I am more interested in more robust H[S|F]P implementation, though it looks like it depends widely on the manufacturer. _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
