-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Michael,
Am 20.03.14 14:03, schrieb Michael Friedrich: > Bumping something to 2.0 just because it was forked and being an > attention whore (pardon) is imho the wrong way. my focus is more on the "he .. I have here a check_tcp version 2.1 which acts badly" and when we anytime will have a 2.1 release (any maybe forks too). this will lead into confusion as this check_tcp is completly different between the forks. Anyways .. I`m not stuck to this year.month thing, but I would prefer a diverting scheme. Cheers, Jan. - -- Never write mail to <[email protected]>, you have been warned! - -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS PE Y++ PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++ - ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTKuo6AAoJEAxwVXtaBlE+DE4P/1LMJr9oWewirq+Qj/zns4xU IjfMa8je+keRFqMlHPTtHOfKxLsTTJPCrlwIN9jWrxlgRm3HgfBfZnVMcDqC8awd 6daUPc6QJrMAAuePd902S2A71CkNfR5kWNPhFiGqcD6PLUajbo2KoFx0aeW4Cd8J d/7DpTCAOKlD3onorw6bKmpPnCbabZvwwNF8QXRDCgi38OCh1AP9yHemD0ud/fKm kZqEEzXHKOQuJBQPOr+DvLywSngPKt1znSunOK6GqecKh04ZL2AhgHG8Rqj1QtT8 IEisanNMHD42MqFbAsJTyRRKumXGA9PPamBX9xte9h0eBICQw+9wOMvp9iyjcxnc kKpT8H71d5XcapVfOj3FLxyX/czJPJyONu4/zLRMCuhyunp2Lna8S+5PCwbQTUyw gm2e+CA4enQMzkvlQhoKIFx+Ej+DtLqLajln3ZRltLCDKjMebzVLBsbZNHMNtXdz wm55k4C2TnxwUOTvcocecMtK/Varg+BcZGwh1iEK8qM+JN36n61liY4VfceMQs47 WXyfwLWu6mVkuN9TZTW/3RHXnoHgw1i+uIImXGaLdWpmS4FWYkN8vY5syEAjYdyA bUo0i8Fn3H09zhRsYIKQ8sD88ow+8ceH1RC+StjTa/chAdwSaNJD1+48NKF8ppfd by3+vw0jiiNNvLz+lBRf =Xt6O -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
