Eric S. Raymond writes:
> Agreed, it would. But if we've verified function with anything outside
> {20,22,28,46} I sure don't know about it.I can add driver 8 mode 5 & mode 133 to that list. For whatever reason the PPS mode actually seems to work better; or at least in the peer list the PPS lock is quite stable, whereas the original ntpd would lose it quite often (dropping from "o" to "*"). At the moment I'm using the direct DCF77 output as PPS signal, which of course is missing each 59th second. I plan to clean up the DCF77 signal with a microcontroller and use one of the other parseclock formats instead (probably Meinberg since their format has good documentation). There are a few differences in how ntpq works and some of the things it outputs, most notably multiple "-c" commands don't seem to work. The original ntpq processes them in order given on the command line. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#KomplexerWaves _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
