Hal Murray <[email protected]>:
> Look ahead a year or two. Assume the NTPWG has agreed upon a good crypto
> layer and that we are happy with our code. What happens next?
Er, most likely I hand off to a successor who doesn't need to be a
forensic systems architect (I'm grooming Daniel Franke for this) and
go looking for another big codebase that badly needs to be fixed.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
