Yo Hal!

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:59:44 -0700
Hal Murray <[email protected]> wrote:

> [email protected] said:
> > It it called newpeer() there would be no problem.  That function
> > tests for NTP_MAXPOLL_UNK and handles the case.   
> 
> Yes, but your code is buggy.
> 
> Here is your code (with a few lines omitted):
> 
>         if (NTP_MAXPOLL_UNK == maxpoll)
>             /* not set yet, set to default */
>             peer->maxpoll = NTP_MAXDPOLL;
>         peer->maxpoll = max(maxpoll, NTP_MINPOLL);


Yes, I know there is a bug, and I know that is from you patch (mostly),
and it still looks good to me.

So, got any patch ideas?

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
        [email protected]  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

Attachment: pgp0SKZf8YCQY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to