Gary E. Miller <[email protected]>: > Yo Eric! > > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 17:24:10 -0400 > "Eric S. Raymond" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Remember, you can't even *build* the KERNEL_PLL version on a platform > > without adjtimex(2). > > The linux man page for adjtimex(2) says that ntp_adjtime() is preferred.
Which I find strange. Preferred for portability, maybe, but
adjtimex() is strictly more powerful.
> What system has adjtimex(2) and not ntp_adjtime(2)?
None that I know of. I doubt any such exost. because if you have
adjtimex(2) you can implement ntp_adjtime(2) with it.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
