> Fixed, I think. I don't have a *BSD test system.
Seems happy. Thanks.
> But in ntpd, the ntp_adjtime() calls never touch the time member. The minor
> mistake I made in introducing ntp_adjtime_ns() was to try to scale the
> Linux-specific time member as though it exists portably and ntpd uses it.
> Neither is the case. When ntpd needs to bump time (as opposed to changing
> the tick rate to slew it) it calls adjtime(2), which may call adjtimex()
> under the covers.
For your collection... :)
OpenBSD has an adjfreq similar to adjtime.
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
devel mailing list