On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Eric S. Raymond <e...@thyrsus.com> wrote:
> My proposal is that we change this before more water has gone under
> the dam. That is:
>
> 1. VERSION should correspond to the last tag, not tne next one.
>
> 2. It should *not* be bumped when we ship 0.9.6 - that will bring it
> into sync with the new convention.
>
> 3. After 0.9.6, I will add logic to bump the contents of VERSION after
> shipping to devel/release, with --major, --minor, and --point
> options.
>
I can see commit 76e974cf
sanjeev@X201wily:~/SRC/ntpsec$ git show 76e974cf
commit 76e974cf16da204c6da73d6fa204677d94990088
Author: Mark Atwood <mark.atw...@ntpsec.org>
Date: Fri Dec 30 21:16:45 2016 +0000
version 0.9.6
Signed-off-by: Mark Atwood <mark.atw...@ntpsec.org>
but
sanjeev@X201wily:~/SRC/ntpsec$ git describe
NTPsec_0_9_5_1-547-gb6b2dd0
Is this a missing tag in git?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
