[extension fields] > That sounds uncomfortably plausible. I can think of a workaround: add a > padding extension long enough that the packet can't have any of the magic > lengths.
Here is the RFC on that area. Network Time Protocol Version 4 (NTPv4) Extension Fields March 2016 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7822 -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
