[email protected] said:
> Concurrency doesn't have to be supported via threads at the language level,
> although they'd map to something thread-like in the kernel most likely. 

Language level support for threads will lead to code that is much easier to 
get right.

The example I'm familiar with is being able to mark a subroutine as expecting 
the caller to hold the lock.  If you want to call it from outside the module, 
you need a wrapper that gets the lock, then calls the routine.  It's another 
level of type checking.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to