Yo Eric! On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:04:50 -0400 "Eric S. Raymond" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gary E. Miller <[email protected]>: > > Not any Apache snippet I have ever seen. I have seen no Apache > > with file suffixes. Got a link to an example? > > The file suffixes for designating which program interprets the snippet > are my addition. The idea I got from apache was leaving the inactive > snippet content in the directory. Mark tells me the distribution > packagers like this kind of config organization because it makes > their scripts simpler. We are conflating two things. The part Achim and I disagree with you on is the suffixes. Nothing more. The rest, directories of snippets, is how I see current practice to be and is fine. Beter than fine: good. RGDS GARY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703 [email protected] Tel:+1 541 382 8588 Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas? "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgp12vNp0xqdt.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
