Daniel Poirot writes: > Using the MISRA 2012 C Guidelines, I find a stunning 19,144 deviations > from the 'full' standard.
See, different number than before. So, is that something we can look at somewhere and ideally have it re-run for each commit or some tags? [I've just seen you've sent the summary to me. On quick glance I see the error categories seem to match my expectations. The distribution in the code maybe not.] > Point being, there are things to look into if anyone is interested. That point is not lost on anyone looking at the code and the reason Eric spent so much effort on getting the LOC down. He's in a better position to comment on what the plan for the future is. I'd personally switch to some subset of C++ since I know that the data types and operations upon them could be encapsulated really well in doing so, both getting the LOC down further and improving testability (maybe even to the point that they can be formally proven correct). Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
