[email protected] said: >> I don't know what the right fix is. > So the fix is to include ntp.h. I thought I had already done that. >> Is sht supposed to be stand-alone? > Yes.
Maybe I should have said build-alone rather than stand-alone. It currently doesn't include ntp.h and only gets one warning (on my setup). So if we change it to use some other randomness, we can remove the linking with our libraries. >> I just pushed fixes for a couple of warnings. > I do not understand this one: > Cool, thanks. I don't understand what you don't understand. After a git pull, I ran tests/option-tester.sh on a Fedora system. It found 3 warnings. I fixed 2 of them. The 3rd is discussed above. > Only 800 more warning messages to fix... Are you using an optional flag or unpushed change to get those? I'm only seeing one warning, the one from sht. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
