Yo Hal! On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:09:18 -0700 Hal Murray <[email protected]> wrote:
> The code in step_systime() is really really ugly. (to my eye)
Look at how it was, before Eric reverted my code. I think that
is clean, but further suggestions welcome. Eric asked no on e touch
that until he reviewed it again.
> It starts by computing the pivot. It gets the build time as a broken
> down struct, subtracts 10 years, converts back to a time_t. All that
> can be precomputed.
And unnecessary.
> Does the 10 year step back make any sense?
What ten yeaer step back?
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
[email protected] Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpqqAsrA3MJp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
