Achim said: <> I think that should be rejected in favor of eliminating l_fp except at the >> very edge and doing the pivot at the edge. > What exactly do you suggest to replace it with?
There are two uses for l_fp: time and offset. By pushing it to the edge, we eliminate uses as time. I would be happy with a double for offsets. Gary wants a timespec to preserve accuracy. That only matters if the offset is huge. The only time that happens is during a giant initial step. I'm willing to live with that. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
