[email protected] said: > I'm aware. There's a separate HAVE_KERNEL_PPS that conditionalizes the code > for the second case.
I can't find any references to HAVE_KERNEL_PPS I assume you mean HAVE_PPSAPI which is only referenced by refclocks --------- I screwed up. There are actually 3 things tangled up here. First: capture pulse timing info. Second: adjust "drift" on system clock Third: in kernel PLL to adjust drift from PPS pulses You can't implement the PLL unless you have a drift to adjust and a way to capture timing info from PPS pulses. A lot of what HAVE_KERNEL_PLL was doing was related to the second rather than the third. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
