Hi, For what it is worth, I am running the ntpsnmpd code on a number of debian and ubuntu machines for some time, including one with an actual GPS. No issues so far.
I just like to see graphs. -- Sanjeev Gupta +65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:09 AM, Richard Laager via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote: > On 02/26/2018 09:50 AM, Mark Atwood via devel wrote: > > Does the Debian packaging have it be it's own package? > > It's unclear to me what exactly you're asking, so I'll give various > information which may help: > > No NTPsec ntpsnmpd has shipped in a released version, so the Debian > package doesn't do anything with it currently, because it doesn't exist. > > The ntp package (NTP Classic) does not ship any ntpsnmpd. It explicitly > configures with --without-ntpsnmpd. It does ship a documentation file > for it, presumably for lack of special-casing that. > > If ntpsnmpd is experimental and there is no precedent from NTP Classic, > my first inclination is to not bother shipping it at all, for now. That > just punts the problem to the future, though, when it's not marked > experimental. > > From the "d" at the end of the name, I assume ntpsnmpd has to run as a > daemon, as opposed to being invoked as a script by snmpd. Off the top of > my head, I'd probably ship it in a separate package. I assume most > people using ntpd will not want ntpsnmpd. > > If that's the route I plan to go, then I'll probably do it sooner, > rather than later, as adding new binary package names requires extra > review (which can take a long time). That way, we start the clock on > ntpsec-snmp (or whatever) while it is still experimental. > > -- > Richard > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@ntpsec.org > http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
