We could kill the interface command, and let the usual syntax error happen.
Or we could raise a special syntax error, calling out the need to use the packet filter instead. Then the question becomes, is it a warn-and-continue, or a error-and-halt? ..m On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:17 PM Eric S. Raymond via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote: > Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>: > > My reading of Eric's concerns is that he doesn't want to remove a > feature > > that somebody is (or might be) using. > > That is currect. But we've already removed stuff people might be using > for infosec reasons; I get much less worried if we have that story. > -- > <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> > > My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: > https://icei.org > Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be > your own. > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@ntpsec.org > http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Mark Atwood http://about.me/markatwood +1-206-604-2198
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel