MLewis via devel writes: > Exactly! It's been on my todo list for a couple of years, but I wasn't > motivated to get into a LKM to get to kernel space to make it > worthwhile. Although I suspected that even from user space, the result > would be better than some PPS.
Well, it sure avoids the interrupt jitter. >> You can actually drop the PPS in this case, as it will provide no benefit. > Agreed. Except possible benefit with alignment, as described above. You don't need any alignment either way (for NTP that is), just reasonably equal-spaced pulses to correlate system w/ GPS time. It's not even a problem if once in a while a pulse was missing, as long as you know which one that was. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Waldorf MIDI Implementation & additional documentation: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfDocs _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
