> That still makes this table a maintainence headache. Can we instead say that > we built on modern/supported-by-upstream releases of popular operating > systems and distributions. And we build test on the platforms supported by > our CI system. See https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/blob/master/ > .gitlab-ci.yml for the specific platforms that we test on.
Two issues: That only tests building. We also need to test actually running, and test refclocks. Or at least document how much testing we actually do. .gitlab-ci.yml isn't exactly user friendly. Yes, it is the truth if you want to know obscure details, but I have troubles reading it. Where is the documentation for that area? Where is the list of systems I get to pick from? > Otherwise, we're maintaining data in 2 places and it's going to get out of > sync. Are there any other places where we have the problem of our documentation representing a snapshot in time? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
