On 1/18/19, Eric S. Raymond via devel <[email protected]> wrote: > While I think I get exactly why JamesB192 unleashed ditaa on the flow > diagram in nts.adoc, I think it's overkill for this use. One of the > possible futures for this document includes large parts of it becoming > the header comment in a file named ntske.c.
I neither have nor use ditaa. I was going to test out an asciidoctor plugin* but failed in that I can not get the thing to install on Windows. It should have taken the ASCII graphic chart and spit out a nice SVG file that was then linked in automagically. * https://asciidoctor.org/docs/asciidoctor-diagram/ > Accordingly, I'm thinking about redrawing it. Only not in > conventional ASCII art; it's 2019 and I think we can get away with > using UTF-8 forms characters. > > They'll display just fine on Linux terminal emulators and in web > pages. Can anybody think of a reason not to do so? I can fall back > to ASCII art... Fine with me if it looks better / is more maintainable than the mess I made. Probably best to remove the pseudo-ditaa header though. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
