Richard Laager via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>:
> On 2/5/19 7:49 PM, Richard Laager wrote:
> > I have a specific proposal that I'll hopefully write up tonight, which
> > may address the needs in this space.
> I did some brainstorming on this with a colleague. I initially started
> with an approach that would consider the system clock (if after
> BUILD_EPOCH), then the drift file (if after BUILD_EPOCH), then accept
> anything. But in the course of discussing it, I came up with something
> that is a lot simpler and easier to reason about.

Please add this as a new section to nts.adoc.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to