Richard Laager via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>:
> Is there a particular reason this needs to be handled right now?
No. But I had some deasd time wile waur=ing for CI to unjam.
> For what it's worth, I think this should wait until NTS is done. NTPv5
> is going to require IETF action. Both the NTPsec developers and the IETF
> people should be working on completing NTS before biting off another
> project.
*Implementation* should absolutely wait until NTS is done. But I figured
other people had dead time due to the busted CI, too. Not a terrible
idea to use it on forward design.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
