Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net>:
> The thing that gripes me about ntp_control is that for each of the tables
> mentioned above, there are actually 3 parallel tables and they are a long way
> apart so a pain to update. Maybe if we just interlaces the #defines with the
> text lookup tables it would be less painful to update.
There's that, also I might be able to consolidate them usubfg a flags field.
> Somebody has to decide what the order is. If you are moving things to ntpq,
> we can fix the order there to be the same.
Less straightforward than I thought while writing my last reply. There turns
out to be an unfortunate adhesion with the way the CTL_OP_READSTAT and
CTL_OP_CLOCKSTAT requests work; if I'm not careful I could cause a comoatibily
problem with Classic ntpq.
Still pondering...
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
