e...@thyrsus.com said:
> The peers display looks OK, so my test to see if a number should be inserted
> in the status field is probably busted. Should be trivial to fix once ntpd
> ships the right thing.
The peers display is often somewhat screwy. I suspect something in your
recent table cleanups is not quite right.
Here is an example. Note the when column doesn't make sense given the poll
and reach.
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
jitter
===============================================================================
=
+glypnod 192.168.1.33 2 u 392 64 377 . .
12.314
-shuksan .PPS. 1 u 101 64 377 . .
250.870
+mon 192.168.1.33 2 u 266 64 377 . .
7.019
-tom .PPS. 1 u 90 64 377 . .
250.748
*cent .PPS. 1 u 78 64 377 . .
1.923
+hgm 192.168.1.33 2 u 950 64 377 . .
26.367
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
