Eric said: >> I don't understand. All I was trying to say is that splitting >> out the refclock drivers to another process shouldn't make >> any difference that is easily visible.
> Maybe. The devil is in the details. > I expect some issues around Mode 6. We'd still need to exchange control > packets with it to query and set clock variables. That's one of the details I'm willing to overlook. I want ntpq -p to look the same. What sort of details do you want to examine or change? --------- >> How do we get 2 processes to read the same data? > We don't. Why do you expect to need this? We need to be able to run gpsmon while it is feeding data to ntpd. Replace gps with your favorite refclock. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
