A different RFC, eventually. But I'm not in a rush. Let people managing large scale deployments figure out what works for them and then standardize around it later.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, 13:25 Achim Gratz via devel <devel@ntpsec.org> wrote: > Daniel Franke via devel writes: > > That's correct: ensuring interop between differing implementations of the > > NTS-KE server and the NTP server is outside the scope of this document. > > So what are the plans for that department? Have everything bloom into > chaos or put it into a different RFC? > > > Regards, > Achim. > -- > +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ > > Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld: > http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@ntpsec.org > http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
