On 3/8/19 8:43 PM, Hal Murray wrote: > rlaa...@wiktel.com said: >>> The draft suggests a way to derive the next key from the current key. >> I thought there was a rough consensus here to avoid that, using >> fully-random keys each time. > > I don't remember that. Any chance you can find it in the archives?
I thought that you, Gary, and I were in favor of random keys (as opposed to ratchet), nobody was speaking against that, and nobody was in favor of ratcheting (at least in a non-pool case). -- Richard _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
