> Most of the thread was about trying all the possible IPv4 and IPv6 addresses > returned for the NTPD server until one worked. So assuming IPv4 for the NTPD > when the NTS-KE is IPv4 is not what the WG expects.
I didn't see any consensus that we have to implement all possible combinations, but rather that the protocol has enough options to implement any combinations that make sense and probably many that aren't interesting. As Richard suggested, if we wanted to implement NTS-KE on -4 and NTP on -6, the syntax would be to add a -4 or -6 between ask/request and the name/address. I don't see any reason to implement the ask/request options yet. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
